 In 1956 the book-reading  world enjoyed "The Summer of John D. MacDonald."
In 1956 the book-reading  world enjoyed "The Summer of John D. MacDonald."
After the December  1955 release of the terrific novel April Evil, the following spring and  summer saw no fewer than three MacDonald books released. In late March the  troubled You Live Once hit the stands, a work that the author had begun  more than a year beforehand and which had already been published in  Cosmopolitan in April 1955. In August his great Murder in the  Wind appeared, a riveting multi-character suspense novel, possibly  MacDonald's best effort to date in that particular form. Between those two  novels appeared one of the most unusual JDM books ever to be produced, an  anthology containing two novellas: one, a six-year old pulp tale that had  originally appeared in Dime Detective called "Five-Star  Fugitive," and the other, an original piece titled simply "Linda."
The title of "Five-Star  Fugitive" was changed to "Border Town Girl" and the title of the anthology was  called that as well. A reader in 1956, without closer inspection, could have  picked up a copy of the new book off the paperback stands fully believing that  he or she was taking home a new John D MacDonald novel, for nowhere on the cover  of the first edition (which was the only edition until 1969) is it  revealed that this is an anthology and that there are two  shorter-than-novel-length works contained therein. Any reservations the reader  may have had over the fact that this wasn't a novel were almost certainly  assuaged after reading the contents of Border Town Girl. The  newly-titled pulp novella was one of the best things MacDonald had ever written  for that market, and the new entry... well, "Linda" was -- and remains -- one of  the best things the author ever wrote.
The strength of "Linda"  lies not in its clever and original plotting -- which is great even by  MacDonald's standards -- but in the voice of the narrator, a lonesome, socially  hapless man whose digressions and lack of self-awareness make him almost unique  in the MacDonald universe. What begins as a simple reminiscence ("Looking back,  I think it was right after the first of the year that Linda...") eventually  reveals a solitary figure, a man with only "two or three close friends," a  protagonist with  social skills so limited that he is unable to see his own wife  for what she really is. This, of course, drives the plot of "Linda," for as we  gradually are told the protagonist's story, the reader immediately recognizes  all of the warning signals missed by the husband. Even the fact that the story  is told as flashback does not diminish the power of a lost quality in Paul  Cowley. He is a literary creation that borrows much from MacDonald's earliest  pulp stories, when the author was still struggling to find his own voice and  borrowing heavily from the hopeless fatalism of Cornell  Woolrich.
This aspect of the  novella's power is easily lost on a lot of readers, at least consciously,  because MacDonald devised such an interesting and unique plot, a murder scheme  so outrageous as to be almost believable. If you have never read "Linda" before  I urge you to stop right now and do so before proceeding with this post, for  there is a plot twist in the middle of the tale that drives the rest of the  story, and to reveal it beforehand to a new reader would be... well, cruel, but  there's no other way to discuss this work. I remember the first time I read  "Linda" and I recall how utterly surprised I was, kind of the same feeling I had  when watching Psycho for the first time, or reading Ira Levin's A  Kiss Before Dying. You know something bad is going to happen -- that's  clearly inferred by the first person narrative -- but nothing prepares you for  it when it actually does. Then, after a disoriented few paragraphs, the intent  all becomes clear and the story takes a turn the reader never  expected.
Paul Cowley certainly has  enough self-awareness to realize how lucky he is. He describes himself about a  third of the way through the story in a way he might not have before the events  that changed his life took place:
"I was merely Paul Cowley,  a mild man who grubbed away at the crab grass -- a man of average height with a  narrow introspective face, sloping shoulders, no-color hair that in the past  year had thinned so much on top that under the fluorescent bathroom light I  could see the gleam of my scalp under the sparse hair. I knew what I was. I was  a worker, with a dogged analytical mind, and hands that were clever with both  tools and figures. I had outgrown my boyhood dreams of triumph. I knew my place  in the world, with my work and my home and my restless and beautiful  wife."
His wife -- Linda -- is  indeed beautiful, a striking brunette with a face that resembles Paulette  Goddard and a figure that would stop traffic. So how, might you ask, did average  Paul end up married to someone like Linda?
They are the same age, grew  up in the same town (another Utica stand-in) and went to school together. But  Paul was basically the same person he described him self as later ("I was even  quieter then than I am now"), and Linda was one of the beautiful people, a  member of the "in crowd" who was always palling around with "the big shots in  the student body" and was typically seen by a pining Paul "... hurrying out to  get into a car with a whole bunch of kids... driving off somewhere, laughing and  having a good time." After graduating Paul joined the army and returned to town  after his hitch was up, alone, unmarried and still a virgin, still carrying a  torch for the girl who didn't even know he existed. "I had thought deeply and  forlornly that this special mystery would never be for me -- that I would never  content myself with lesser flesh and thus would go through life tragically  alone."
So imagine his surprise  when he sees Linda on a city street. He bravely greets her and reminds her that  the two of them went to school together, something that Linda obviously didn't  know, although she feigns recognition. They have coffee together and Paul  gradually sees the changes that have taken place in her.
"... she didn't look good  at all. She looked as if she had been sick. Her clothing was shabby. All the  life she had had in high school seemed to have faded."
  She begins to tell him her  sad story. Her "people" were dead. (MacDonald's consistent use of the word  "people" when he means "family" or "parents" -- not only here but in all of his  work -- obviously must mean something, but that's a subject for another day.)  She had married a marine who was killed and "his people, Kentucky people" wanted  nothing to do with their son's widow. She worked in California and married an  Air Force warrant officer, who "got in some kind of jam and had been given a  dishonorable discharge." She later found that he already had a wife and two kids  back in Maine. He left and she got sick. After spending some time in a hospital  as a "charity case," Linda returned to her hometown, broke and broken, with "the  heart taken out of her." It was only under circumstances such as these that a  man like Paul would have a chance with a woman like Linda.
She begins to tell him her  sad story. Her "people" were dead. (MacDonald's consistent use of the word  "people" when he means "family" or "parents" -- not only here but in all of his  work -- obviously must mean something, but that's a subject for another day.)  She had married a marine who was killed and "his people, Kentucky people" wanted  nothing to do with their son's widow. She worked in California and married an  Air Force warrant officer, who "got in some kind of jam and had been given a  dishonorable discharge." She later found that he already had a wife and two kids  back in Maine. He left and she got sick. After spending some time in a hospital  as a "charity case," Linda returned to her hometown, broke and broken, with "the  heart taken out of her." It was only under circumstances such as these that a  man like Paul would have a chance with a woman like Linda.
 She begins to tell him her  sad story. Her "people" were dead. (MacDonald's consistent use of the word  "people" when he means "family" or "parents" -- not only here but in all of his  work -- obviously must mean something, but that's a subject for another day.)  She had married a marine who was killed and "his people, Kentucky people" wanted  nothing to do with their son's widow. She worked in California and married an  Air Force warrant officer, who "got in some kind of jam and had been given a  dishonorable discharge." She later found that he already had a wife and two kids  back in Maine. He left and she got sick. After spending some time in a hospital  as a "charity case," Linda returned to her hometown, broke and broken, with "the  heart taken out of her." It was only under circumstances such as these that a  man like Paul would have a chance with a woman like Linda.
She begins to tell him her  sad story. Her "people" were dead. (MacDonald's consistent use of the word  "people" when he means "family" or "parents" -- not only here but in all of his  work -- obviously must mean something, but that's a subject for another day.)  She had married a marine who was killed and "his people, Kentucky people" wanted  nothing to do with their son's widow. She worked in California and married an  Air Force warrant officer, who "got in some kind of jam and had been given a  dishonorable discharge." She later found that he already had a wife and two kids  back in Maine. He left and she got sick. After spending some time in a hospital  as a "charity case," Linda returned to her hometown, broke and broken, with "the  heart taken out of her." It was only under circumstances such as these that a  man like Paul would have a chance with a woman like Linda.
He marries her. Paul  describes his first year of marriage in a few beautifully descriptive paragraphs  that set the tone of the relationship and gives movement to the occurrences that  happen later. They are great examples of an unreliable narrator, but subtly so,  showing a person still somewhat self-delusional even after the events of the  story have taken place.
"At first Linda seemed  tired all the way through, but as the months went by she began to come alive  more and more. She was fond of me and grateful to me. I did not demand that she  love me. I hoped it would come later, but when it didn't seem to, I didn't mind  too much. It was enough to have her around, and know that wherever we went,  people looked at her.
"... Maybe no marriage is  entirely good or bad. I only know that after the first year there was a strain  between us. Linda wanted a life that I didn't want. I told her her values were  superficial; she told me that life was more than waiting for death. There were  no blazing quarrels. My temper is not of that breed. And in the last few years  things became easier between us. We worked out a sort of compromise. She lived  my way, and when we could afford it, she would take a trip, usually to Chicago.  That seemed to ease her nervous tension.
"I had hoped, of course,  that we would have children. But that was denied us. The doctor she went to said  that it had something to do with how sick she had been in California. It would  have done much to end her restlessness, I thought, but since it could not be, we  managed to work out a life with a minimum of strain. Sometimes, out of  irritation, she would say cruel things to me, calling me a nonentity, a zero, a  statistic. But I understood, or I thought I did.She was an earthy, hot-blooded  woman, and our life was pretty quiet."
Even when describing his  sex life, Paul never seems to fully comprehend the kind of person he has  married.
"I'd never been with a  woman until we were married. I kind of resented her knowing more about it than I  did, but in some ways I was glad she did because it made things a lot easier at  first. She was always moody about it. By that I mean that sometimes she'd seem  to want to and a lot of time she wouldn't. It was generally pretty quick the  times she's want to, and the times she didn't she acted like she was bored and  just wished it would be over."
So, into this wonderful  relationship come the Jeffries, a neighborhood couple whose husband is a  hot-shot salesman at the company Paul works for. They become friendly and start  spending time together, mostly bridge and canasta nights at one of their houses.  Brandon Jeffries -- known to one and all as Jeff -- is described by Paul as  "tall and good looking in a sort of rugged way," and his wife Stella is a quiet,  petite blonde, "not a pretty woman," who happens to be the beneficiary of a  large family trust fund. Looking back on this the somewhat-wiser Paul claims he  saw nothing out of the ordinary in all of this, no hint of a deeper relationship  between his beautiful, bored wife and their handsome neighbor friend. He even  looked for it early in their friendship, "because if anyone had a chance of  making out, that Jeff Jeffries certainly would," but outside of a few  "burlesque" passes made in jest, Jeff seemed like an upstanding guy who was  remarkably attentive to his quiet wife. Paul does understand now why Linda  suddenly "began to take an almost frantic interest in her appearance" after the  Jeffries came into their lives, "spending a lot of money on creams and lotions,  taking strange diets, working hard on grotesque exercises..." But at the time,  he was clueless.
He is equally clueless --  as is Stella -- when Jeff suddenly suggests a joint vacation, on a remote west  Florida key in the middle of October, before the expensive season begins but  late enough to miss the early snow of the north. Another neighborhood couple had  vacationed there the past fall and raved about the solitude, the fishing,  swimming and warm sun. There were two cabins, built close together but remotely  located eight miles from the nearest town. Jeff suggests that they rent the  cabins together, an idea that Linda quickly picks up on and becomes enthusiastic  about. Stella is lukewarm to the idea but Paul is steadfastly against it. He  wants to go up to a nearby lake. But Jeff and Linda continue to harp on the  idea, eventually convincing a now-willing Stella, and it's three against one a  few weeks later when Paul definitively puts his foot down against the idea. The  Jeffries go home early that evening and Paul awaits the wrath of his wife, which  never comes. She has another way to convince him.
"... we went up to bed... She fooled around [in the bathroom] and I was in bed first. Finally she came out... and stood in the doorway with the light from the bathroom shining right through some sort of flimsy thing I'd never seen on her before... She stood there for a long time. As I said, I've never seen a better figure on a woman in my life. She turned the light off, finally, and I could hear the rustling of her as she came toward me in the darkness, hear the rustling, and then smell a new kind of heavy perfume she had put on, and then feel her strong arms around me as she brought her lips down on mine there in our dark bedroom."

"... we went up to bed... She fooled around [in the bathroom] and I was in bed first. Finally she came out... and stood in the doorway with the light from the bathroom shining right through some sort of flimsy thing I'd never seen on her before... She stood there for a long time. As I said, I've never seen a better figure on a woman in my life. She turned the light off, finally, and I could hear the rustling of her as she came toward me in the darkness, hear the rustling, and then smell a new kind of heavy perfume she had put on, and then feel her strong arms around me as she brought her lips down on mine there in our dark bedroom."
When their lovemaking is  over, Linda tells Paul "now you know why I want to go to Florida. I want a new  start for our marriage." Paul needs no more convincing. "I knew I wanted it to  happen again just that way, and if I had to go to Florida to guarantee it, then  I would go to Florida."
The couples travel  separately, with the Cowley's arriving first. Once the Jeffries appear, things  turn strange. While the four of them are out sunning on the beach the first day  they are together, Linda abruptly gets up and barks out an order: "Come on,  Jeff." Without a word, Jeff got up and the two of them walked down the beach  together until they were far away and out of sight.
"I don't think I can  explain exactly why it created such an awkward situation. Certainly Linda and  Jeff could walk together, as could Stella and I, should we want to. The four of  us were, I thought, friends. But it was the manner in which they left us.  Linda's tone had been peremptory, autocratic. Jeff had obeyed immediately. It  spoke of a relationship I had not suspected. Had it been done in a normal way,  they would have said something about walking down the beach, and coming back  soon, and don't get too much sun -- like that. They just left... Now this is  hard to explain. Their action made me revert to the way I had felt about Linda  many years ago. She had walked off, out of reach. She was back with the  beautiful people. I was again the Paul Cowley who worked after school and knew  so few people in our class."
Thus begins a continuous  series of similar incidents, with Linda and Jeff disappearing together for long  periods of time and with no attempt at explanation or subterfuge. Paul confronts  his wife and she responds with sarcasm. "Why don't you run along and catch some  nice fish again?" she suggests. Later he talks to Jeff, who acts innocent but  whose condescension leads to a brief exchange of blows, where Paul is -- of  course -- bested.
 Stella, unburdened by  Paul's deep insecurities, immediately understands what is happening. The long  periods she and Paul are forced to spend together while their respective spouses  are gone brings them closer than they ever were as friendly neighbors, and they  spend time going into town to shop and take long walks on the beach together.  Paul has never thought of Stella as anything other than a "nice" woman who  wasn't very attractive, but their closeness begins to change that.  Interestingly, MacDonald saves his most descriptive prose for Stella, perhaps  because she is the only "good" female in the story, or perhaps to serve as a red  herring.
Stella, unburdened by  Paul's deep insecurities, immediately understands what is happening. The long  periods she and Paul are forced to spend together while their respective spouses  are gone brings them closer than they ever were as friendly neighbors, and they  spend time going into town to shop and take long walks on the beach together.  Paul has never thought of Stella as anything other than a "nice" woman who  wasn't very attractive, but their closeness begins to change that.  Interestingly, MacDonald saves his most descriptive prose for Stella, perhaps  because she is the only "good" female in the story, or perhaps to serve as a red  herring.
 Stella, unburdened by  Paul's deep insecurities, immediately understands what is happening. The long  periods she and Paul are forced to spend together while their respective spouses  are gone brings them closer than they ever were as friendly neighbors, and they  spend time going into town to shop and take long walks on the beach together.  Paul has never thought of Stella as anything other than a "nice" woman who  wasn't very attractive, but their closeness begins to change that.  Interestingly, MacDonald saves his most descriptive prose for Stella, perhaps  because she is the only "good" female in the story, or perhaps to serve as a red  herring.
Stella, unburdened by  Paul's deep insecurities, immediately understands what is happening. The long  periods she and Paul are forced to spend together while their respective spouses  are gone brings them closer than they ever were as friendly neighbors, and they  spend time going into town to shop and take long walks on the beach together.  Paul has never thought of Stella as anything other than a "nice" woman who  wasn't very attractive, but their closeness begins to change that.  Interestingly, MacDonald saves his most descriptive prose for Stella, perhaps  because she is the only "good" female in the story, or perhaps to serve as a red  herring.
"I was behind her. Her  small firm hips were round under the ruffled suit. I saw the long delicacy of  her legs, and the blue tracks of veins in the backs of her knees. Her waist was  slender, her back was straight. The lines of her shoulders and throat were clear  and clean... I walked beside her again [and] looked almost furtively at her  high, small breasts, the flex and lift of her thighs as she walked. I had taken  her for granted, never quite looking at her, believing her body to be gaunt,  bony... I made inevitable comparisons [with Linda.] Stella was subtle in the way  that a Japanese print is subtle... Linda was a portrait in heavy  oils."
It is also here where  MacDonald's dated depiction of (some) women is at its worst and most  embarrassing.
"... if Linda chose to hurt  me, an action I could halfway understand through critical appraisal of myself,  Jeff, in denying this woman, was doing something less understandable and more  brutal. Perhaps there is always a deeper and more bitter significance when a  woman is hurt. Traditionally. a man can turn to other arms, salving his ego. A  woman can only wonder why the gift of herself is found not to be  enough."
After nearly three weeks of  enduring Linda and Jeff's strange behavior, Stella tells Paul that when they get  home she is going to divorce Jeff. The "bushels" of money in her trust fund will  allow her to live on her own, and she even half-jokingly suggests to Paul that  the two of them leave together. "God, how they'd writhe!" Paul responds like  someone out of a bad Victorian novel: "But we can't, of course." They go off to  their spot on the beach to spend this last day in the sun, while Jeff is off in  the distance shooting beer cans with a .22 rifle he brought with him. Linda, who  is still up in the cottage, comes down and Paul closes his eyes. A short time  later he opens them and sees Jeff squatting next to Stella, his jaw clenched. A  shadow falls over Paul and he turns to see Linda, holding the rifle and aiming  it down toward the three of them on the blanket. She fires and kills Stella with  a single bullet to the brain. She then turns the gun on Jeff, who cries out in  panic and takes off running toward the water. Linda's aim follows him as she  shoots him twice and Jeff topples into the waves of the Gulf.  A stupefied Paul  wrenches the gun out of his wife's hands and tries to drag her back to the  cottage, but she goes limp. "Her eyes were like frosted glass. The lower half of  her face was slack. Her underlip had fallen away from her teeth." Paul gets in  the car and drives to the nearby town alone.
He's just had the shock of  a lifetime, but it's nothing like what awaits him when he returns to the scene  with the police.
From this point on the  novella completely shifts gears and becomes a different kind of tale. We're only  30 pages into a 72 page story, so there is a lot still to tell, and even though  we've left the Woolrichian prelude behind us, it has prepared an excellent  groundwork for what is still to come. MacDonald obviously had two great stories  to tell in this wonderfully organic tale and combined them expertly to tell a  perfectly self-contained narrative.
The reason "Linda" appeared  in book form rather than in a magazine is likely due to its length, as it is  much longer than a typical novella and too short to be a novel. Perhaps it was  intended as a novel but MacDonald belatedly realized that he would have to pad  an already perfect tale in order to sell it as a book, and MacDonald hated  padding. He once told Ed Gorman, "I hate puffing things.  Cutting is fine.   Everything can use cutting.  But puffing creates fat."
The Border Town  Girl anthology was originally published by Popular Library, their third  MacDonald paperback original and fourth JDM novel. (Popular released the  paperback version of the author's hardcover novel Contrary Pleasure in  October 1955.) It seems to have been reviewed by only one publication, The  New York Times and the steadfast JDM supporter Anthony Boucher. He  wrote that "['Linda'] presents one of the most ingenious and inescapable  frame-ups for murder that I've ever encountered," which is high praise indeed  from someone who read mystery novels for a living. The original printing  featured the most sedate JDM cover to date, illustrated by an unknown artist,  depicting a smoking, bare-shouldered Linda Cowley staring back at the reader  with a "don't-mess-with-me" expression. (I'm guessing it's Linda -- it doesn't  fit the description of anyone in "Border Town Girl.") Popular issued a modest  run of only 200,000 copies and the book was quickly  forgotten.

When Fawcett began reprinting the novels of MacDonald in the sixties, following the success of the Travis McGee series, Border Town Girl was one of the last to see daylight. It reappeared in July of 1969 and featured its most recognizable cover, a Robert McGinnis original featuring Linda in a purple shirt (and nothing else) holding a scope rifle next to her. Also depicted is one of the females from "Border Town Girl" with a large sombrero draped over her back, probably Diana Saybree. The re-publication was heavily reviewed by the press of the time, with the Chicago Tribune's Clarence Petersen (another longtime JDM fan and supporter) calling "Linda" "... one of MacDonald's best tales... [it] is as chilling as it is gratifying." Reviews appeared in Publisher's Weekly, the St. Petersburg Times, the Springfield Journal-Register, the Boca Raton News and the Buffalo Evening News. It was even reviewed in several British newspapers as well as in the Dublin Herald. Most were favorable and nearly all singled out "Linda" as the superior of the two novellas.

When Fawcett began reprinting the novels of MacDonald in the sixties, following the success of the Travis McGee series, Border Town Girl was one of the last to see daylight. It reappeared in July of 1969 and featured its most recognizable cover, a Robert McGinnis original featuring Linda in a purple shirt (and nothing else) holding a scope rifle next to her. Also depicted is one of the females from "Border Town Girl" with a large sombrero draped over her back, probably Diana Saybree. The re-publication was heavily reviewed by the press of the time, with the Chicago Tribune's Clarence Petersen (another longtime JDM fan and supporter) calling "Linda" "... one of MacDonald's best tales... [it] is as chilling as it is gratifying." Reviews appeared in Publisher's Weekly, the St. Petersburg Times, the Springfield Journal-Register, the Boca Raton News and the Buffalo Evening News. It was even reviewed in several British newspapers as well as in the Dublin Herald. Most were favorable and nearly all singled out "Linda" as the superior of the two novellas.
Fawcett published four  printings of the book featuring variations on McGinnis' illustration before  changing it completely for their February 1977 run. That version -- which  enjoyed three more printings -- featured a cover by Don Daily, who had earlier  illustrated a reprint of MacDonald's Soft Touch. It featured a montage  depicting a swimming Linda and a the city skyline of Piedras Chicas from "Border Town Girl." The final four Fawcett printings sported a new cover by William  Schmidt, who did illustrations for most of the final printings of the JDM canon.  It depicts Felicia from "Border Town Girl," shown only from the waist down,  wearing a very short dress and a wicked-looking knife tucked into her  garter.
If "Linda" is remembered at  all today it is probably because of one of the two film versions of the novella.  Both efforts were Made-for-Television movies and both fell short of depicting  the feel of the story, yet both were relatively faithful to the source material  and have aspects to recommend. The first version was made in 1973 and aired as  an entry of the ABC Saturday Suspense Movie  of the Week. The wonderful Stella Stevens portrayed Linda, with Ed Nelson  playing Paul and John McIntire as Jeff. The film opens with the murder scene,  certainly an attention-grabber, but by doing so discards most of the wonderful  background story, which is relegated to one flashback scene. It also robs the  character Paul of much of its sympathy, and poor Ed Nelson is made to look  like a bad dinner theater actor in the early, post-shooting scenes. Still,  Stevens is very good (despite having the wrong hair color for the role) and the  Technicolor photography gives an especially lush and beautiful look to the  exterior scenes. But a made-for-TV movie is a made-for-TV movie -- especially in  1973 -- and this one invariably looks like one, from its bad acting in secondary  roles to the cheap lighting of location shooting and the crappy dialogue written  by screenwriter Merwin Gerard.
 Twenty years later the USA Network produced its own  adaptation, again as a made-for television movie (technically made-for-cable, I  guess). It is a far more faithful version that maintains the novella's timeline  without resorting to flashback and that retains much of MacDonald's original  dialogue. Virginia Madson (another blonde!) plays the title role and Richard  Thomas turns in a great performance as Paul, an actor whose physical appearance  and demeanor has far more fidelity to the character that did Ed Nelson. But, as  hard as the screenwriter and director tried, the feel of the characters never  really comes across. Linda seems more of a venal, selfish woman-child than the  evil character of the novella, and there are too many badly acted scenes to make  this film worth recommending. There are several gratuitous scenes that were  added by the filmmakers, including a near-tryst in a motel between Paul and  Stella, that serve no real purpose. Still, Thomas comes across as closer to  MacDonald's character than anyone, and it is for his performance that the film  is worth watching. There's also a really neat touch in one of the beach scenes,  showing Paul lying on a blanket with a paperback book spread open over his face.  The book? Border Town Girl.
Twenty years later the USA Network produced its own  adaptation, again as a made-for television movie (technically made-for-cable, I  guess). It is a far more faithful version that maintains the novella's timeline  without resorting to flashback and that retains much of MacDonald's original  dialogue. Virginia Madson (another blonde!) plays the title role and Richard  Thomas turns in a great performance as Paul, an actor whose physical appearance  and demeanor has far more fidelity to the character that did Ed Nelson. But, as  hard as the screenwriter and director tried, the feel of the characters never  really comes across. Linda seems more of a venal, selfish woman-child than the  evil character of the novella, and there are too many badly acted scenes to make  this film worth recommending. There are several gratuitous scenes that were  added by the filmmakers, including a near-tryst in a motel between Paul and  Stella, that serve no real purpose. Still, Thomas comes across as closer to  MacDonald's character than anyone, and it is for his performance that the film  is worth watching. There's also a really neat touch in one of the beach scenes,  showing Paul lying on a blanket with a paperback book spread open over his face.  The book? Border Town Girl.
 Twenty years later the USA Network produced its own  adaptation, again as a made-for television movie (technically made-for-cable, I  guess). It is a far more faithful version that maintains the novella's timeline  without resorting to flashback and that retains much of MacDonald's original  dialogue. Virginia Madson (another blonde!) plays the title role and Richard  Thomas turns in a great performance as Paul, an actor whose physical appearance  and demeanor has far more fidelity to the character that did Ed Nelson. But, as  hard as the screenwriter and director tried, the feel of the characters never  really comes across. Linda seems more of a venal, selfish woman-child than the  evil character of the novella, and there are too many badly acted scenes to make  this film worth recommending. There are several gratuitous scenes that were  added by the filmmakers, including a near-tryst in a motel between Paul and  Stella, that serve no real purpose. Still, Thomas comes across as closer to  MacDonald's character than anyone, and it is for his performance that the film  is worth watching. There's also a really neat touch in one of the beach scenes,  showing Paul lying on a blanket with a paperback book spread open over his face.  The book? Border Town Girl.
Twenty years later the USA Network produced its own  adaptation, again as a made-for television movie (technically made-for-cable, I  guess). It is a far more faithful version that maintains the novella's timeline  without resorting to flashback and that retains much of MacDonald's original  dialogue. Virginia Madson (another blonde!) plays the title role and Richard  Thomas turns in a great performance as Paul, an actor whose physical appearance  and demeanor has far more fidelity to the character that did Ed Nelson. But, as  hard as the screenwriter and director tried, the feel of the characters never  really comes across. Linda seems more of a venal, selfish woman-child than the  evil character of the novella, and there are too many badly acted scenes to make  this film worth recommending. There are several gratuitous scenes that were  added by the filmmakers, including a near-tryst in a motel between Paul and  Stella, that serve no real purpose. Still, Thomas comes across as closer to  MacDonald's character than anyone, and it is for his performance that the film  is worth watching. There's also a really neat touch in one of the beach scenes,  showing Paul lying on a blanket with a paperback book spread open over his face.  The book? Border Town Girl.
Incidentally, "Linda" is one of only three John D  MacDonald works that had been produced twice for either film or television. The  other two are the versions of The Executioners (both filmed as Cape  Fear) and two very early television versions of his science fiction short  story, "A Child is Crying." That work appeared as episodes of both Lights  Out in 1950 and Tales of Tomorrow in  1951.
Finally, "Linda" holds one other distinction in the JDM  canon, one I don't believe was ever repeated. Most of the author's works, when  they appeared in both book and magazine form, typically showed up in a magazine  first, then later in a book, usually a short story anthology. "Linda" did the  opposite. Three years after being published as the back end of Border Town  Girl, "Linda" was featured in the March 1959 issue of Climax, a  now-forgotten men's adventure magazine that ran from 1957 to 1963.  Climax featured the usual fare of tough-guy action stories, somewhat  fanciful non-fiction usually about war exploits, gangsters or safaris, and tame  black-and-white cheesecake spreads featuring young women in various states of  near-undress. (There's a really great blog dedicated to men's adventure  magazines, titled -- appropriately enough -- Men's Adventure  Magazines.) "Linda" was JDM's only appearance in Climax and it was  featured without any mention of its prior publication. It was advertised as a  "book-length feature" but was heavily edited to a shorter length. It did sport  some nice artwork, that semi-primitive variety that was a hallmark of these  kinds of second-tier periodicals, and the magazine's editors certainly knew  their audience. There are only two brief scenes in "Linda" featuring sex or  nudity, and the artist (not credited) was kind enough to illustrate both of  them.
Border Town Girl is, of course, currently out  of print but easy to find on any used book website.


 
 
Really great review and some nice art work I had never seen before. Later Slap
ReplyDeleteThank you "Slap," I appreciate it.
ReplyDeleteI just finished "Linda" last night and had finished "Border Town Girl" right before. You are right about "Linda". What a great read. At first I thought the unreliable narrator might be really unreliable and would turn out to be culpable but JDM turned it into a great story. I wasn't as thrilled with "Border Town Girl". I am sure it was solid for the pulps but I enjoyed "Linda" much more. Thanks again for your efforts.
ReplyDeleteThanks Frank. I love "Border Town Girl" for what it is: pure pulp. "Linda," however, is in a class by itself.
Delete